On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Jef Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Dan Williams <dcbw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> In any case, badmouthing systemd for an upgrade bug where it actually >> works fine *when you're really running F15* doesn't seem right. I >> wouldn't have had this problem if it'd installed off the Live CD or done >> a fresh install. > > Shrug, I don't make it a point to do yum based upgrades across release > boundaries so that would explain why i didn't encounter it. > > Did anyone doing and testing the "not supported" upgrade dance to F15 > bother filing it at any point? Obviously people use it regardless of > what the support policy is. I would imagine one of them would file it > as a market for other people who aren't going to follow policy. I've been yum upgrading since FC1. I didn't see that. I was also running a mysql server. > I noticed it wasn't list as a common gotcha on the F15 commons bug > page that is maintained to handle these sorts of quibbles. Do we allow > for recognition of the "not supported" upgrade dance in the common > bugs information as a policy or is it the "upgrade path that must not > be named"? > > -jef > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
