Jeff Spaleta <jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2010/7/22 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx>: > > I think it's time to re-inform everyone since they seemed to be so > > focused on systemd and have completely forgot about upstart. > > > > Nobody has said anything that upstart was being deprecated nobody! > > That's not exactly what I'm talking about... though that's certainly > another fallback position which should I hope provide enough of a > fallback solution for Chris others who agree with him. > > I'm talking about the _better_ fallback position of relying on > systemd's compatibility with sysinit style init instead of systemd > native files when specific sysadmins find that their > configuration/management infrastructure isn't ready to handle the > native files and then work towards moving services to native as they > get more confident in the new configuration format. Compatibility with native SysVinit-style upstart is of very little help if the relevant commands (at least the most used options) aren't available. E.g. when the big switchover from ipchains to iptables was in swing, you could (almost) use your old configuration files (mostly calls to the relevant commands) with no change. -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 2340000 Fax: +56 32 2797513
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
