Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 5:47 PM, James Antill <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 17:16 +0200, drago01 wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Once upon a time, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> said:
>> >> And as the general rule goes "native configuration breaks legacy
>> >> configuration" so if a native systemd $service file does exist than
>> >> changing service via chkconfig no longer will work.
>> >
>> > As an admin, this is crap.  Where does this "general rule" come from?
>> > As strong desire to piss off the people that actually use your software?
>>
>> So "different == crap" ?
>>
>> If it does provide a hard to use interface I'd understand the
>> frustration but only because it is NEW / DIFFERENT does not mean that
>> the world is falling over.
>
>  In general, yes, it does (just not to you):

I though we where talking about *admins* here not $grandma ...

And when I say/here admin I'd expect to be talking about a human (not
some kind of robot that has hardwired commands and can't adapt to
changes).
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux