On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 17:16 +0200, drago01 wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Once upon a time, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> said: > >> And as the general rule goes "native configuration breaks legacy > >> configuration" so if a native systemd $service file does exist than > >> changing service via chkconfig no longer will work. > > > > As an admin, this is crap. Where does this "general rule" come from? > > As strong desire to piss off the people that actually use your software? > > So "different == crap" ? > > If it does provide a hard to use interface I'd understand the > frustration but only because it is NEW / DIFFERENT does not mean that > the world is falling over. In general, yes, it does (just not to you): http://skvidal.wordpress.com/2008/10/29/fedora-culture-clashes/ ...however this case (breaking service/chkconfig) seems like such a huge pointless difference that I can't imagine RHEL-7 not requiring that it's fixed. So the only real question is how long Fedora users have to live with it broken. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
