Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Once upon a time, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> said:
>> And as the general rule goes "native configuration breaks legacy
>> configuration" so if a native systemd $service file does exist than
>> changing service via chkconfig no longer will work.
>
> As an admin, this is crap.  Where does this "general rule" come from?
> As strong desire to piss off the people that actually use your software?

So "different == crap" ?

If it does provide a hard to use interface I'd understand the
frustration but only because it is NEW / DIFFERENT does not mean that
the world is falling over.

Seriously an admin that refuses to learn anything new ("omg it isn't
the same as I have been doing for the last 10 years)  he should really
consider changing job / profession.

Changes aren't bad for the sole reasons of being changes.

If the new interface is crap ok complain about it but it being
different (as long as it is documented) is a non issue IMO.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux