Once upon a time, drago01 <drago01@xxxxxxxxx> said:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Once upon a time, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> said:
> >> And as the general rule goes "native configuration breaks legacy
> >> configuration" so if a native systemd $service file does exist than
> >> changing service via chkconfig no longer will work.
> >
> > As an admin, this is crap. Where does this "general rule" come from?
> > As strong desire to piss off the people that actually use your software?
>
> So "different == crap" ?
Different for no good reason (other than to break legacy configuration)
is crap. Providing multiple interfaces, one to manage some services and
one to manage the others, is major crap.
> Seriously an admin that refuses to learn anything new ("omg it isn't
> the same as I have been doing for the last 10 years) he should really
> consider changing job / profession.
This isn't about managing one system; it's about managing lots of
systems and now one is different (but only for some services, who knows
which) for no good reason.
> Changes aren't bad for the sole reasons of being changes.
Change for the sake of change is always a bad sign of "let's reinvent
the wheel". How hard would it be to provide backwards-compatible
chkconfig and service commands?
--
Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
