On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 12:58 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > Thanks, but afaics that thread doesn't really answer any of my > > questions, it's just a bunch of yum technicalities about how the > > implementation of having two packages actually works. What I'm > > interested in is what was the original reason for having two branches > > packaged, and do we still need to do it (or even have 3). > > Jeff Splata's reply seemed to be enlightening, at least to me: ah, thanks, missed that one. I guess we could have a look and see what versions are in the still-supported releases of popular distros, and just go with those. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
