On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:51:02 -0500, Michael wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > What was the initial reason for the 2.18 / 2.27 packaging > > split? Is there any reason to continue to package multiple releases? > > Should we just go back to having a single, 2.32-versioned 'unison' > > package, or should we bump unison227 to be 2.32, or add a unison232 > > package? > > My memory[1] scares me sometimes. > > [1] > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-April/msg01229.html My memory adds that it has been discussed somewhere else, perhaps on EPEL's list. The multiple packages were needed for compatibility. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
