Fedora packaging: unison?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, Gerard. I just realized I need a newer build of Unison - 2.32 - to
sync with a machine running a different distro. I see from the -devel
archives that you currently don't have enough time to maintain your
packages.

I'd like to ask you to make me a co-maintainer so I can do this, but
obviously with the way you have unison packaged there's something of a
wrinkle :). What was the initial reason for the 2.18 / 2.27 packaging
split? Is there any reason to continue to package multiple releases?
Should we just go back to having a single, 2.32-versioned 'unison'
package, or should we bump unison227 to be 2.32, or add a unison232
package? Thanks!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux