Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Colin Walters wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > I think the bigger question is why are we doing this?
>
> There's some motivation here:
> http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/systemd.html
>

I was pretty clear in everything you cut off about the whole "You know
what people need, they need this" and the whole developers making things
for sysadmins because they think sysadmins need it thing.  0pointer.de is
Lennart's post.  If this is only being developed and driven by the same
people perhaps we should just step back, get it functioning for a while,
_then_ lets talk about replacements.  If you guys feel that strongly about
it, you'll still feel that way a year from now when the whole system is
developed and working right?  Perhaps then it can go into Fedora?

This should probably say "systemd for F16"

	-Mike
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux