Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jul 2010, Colin Walters wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I think the bigger question is why are we doing this? > > > > There's some motivation here: > > http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/systemd.html > I was pretty clear in everything you cut off about the whole "You know > what people need, they need this" and the whole developers making things > for sysadmins because they think sysadmins need it thing. Perhaps not sysadmins per se (managing big boxes, mostly with strange, varying requirements depending on the exact set of services offered), but users on foot (handling startup, services, ... "invisibly" is a big bonus for personal machines). Sure, sysadmins get help by having users pester less too ;-) > 0pointer.de is > Lennart's post. If this is only being developed and driven by the same > people perhaps we should just step back, get it functioning for a while, > _then_ lets talk about replacements. If you guys feel that strongly about > it, you'll still feel that way a year from now when the whole system is > developed and working right? Perhaps then it can go into Fedora? Nope. I still remember the pain in going from SunOS (BSD-style init, one big rc file) to Solaris (SysV style). Much gnashing of teeth, calling Sun ugly names, and trying to shoehorn everything into rc.local or some such. It took a while, afterwards I didn't want to look back. It's called "education", and it doesn't come cheap. > This should probably say "systemd for F16" To me Fedora is about trying out new stuff, so I'm in favor of giving it a shot in F14. -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 2340000 Fax: +56 32 2797513 -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
