Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 22.07.10 19:08, Toshio Kuratomi (a.badger@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:

> > Now that everybody has been (re)informed we can go back on focusing 
> > working out these issues together without any negativity on any ones behalf.
> > 
> This may not be true.  No packaging guidelines have been put forth
> for systemd yet so I cannot know:
> 
> * if we continue to require sysVinit scripts in the guidlines, this is true.
> * If we don't, then sysadmins that have to install packages without sysvinit
>   scripts will have to deal with writing their own init scripts.

My take on this is that sysvinit scripts should be a requirement, and
systemd unit files an optional addition. Given that the guidelines have
not been updated in any way this is basically what the guideliness
currently say.

And the for F15 we can reinvestiaget this.

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux