Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Lennart Poettering (mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > * if we continue to require sysVinit scripts in the guidlines, this is true.
> > * If we don't, then sysadmins that have to install packages without sysvinit
> >   scripts will have to deal with writing their own init scripts.
> 
> My take on this is that sysvinit scripts should be a requirement, and
> systemd unit files an optional addition. Given that the guidelines have
> not been updated in any way this is basically what the guideliness
> currently say.

I would say until we get a coherent story and guidelines on the packaging,
activation, etc. of systemd unit files in a way that's unlikely to change
long-term, that systemd unit files should not be encouraged. I don't want to
have to train packagers each release.

That being said, from reading the rest of this thread, it looks like we're
making progress on that front.

Bill
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux