Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Please, stop mentioning that there are flaws in fedora-usermgmt >> without naming them! >> > You're joking right? I don't want to get all ad-hominem here but > multiple people have mentioned multiple issues / flaws Are you working for SCO, or why do you not give an example for such an (technical) issue and/or point me to the posting(s)? > and aside from a documentation mistype you basically told them "There > is no flaw" If there "is no flaw" why is this thread still going on? I do not know why e.g. Axel posted several messages about fedora-usermgmt before he tried it the first time. > Why does our downstream EPEL still not know what to do? dunno > Do you really think Axel and I have made up issues in the software > and implementation for our own amusement? Dunno, perhaps you like the clicking of your keyboard when you are writing mails? Enrico -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly