Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > But for whatever its worth let's raise the fixed/non-fixed >> >> > cross-over from uid/gid 100 to 200 for F8 or F9. >> >> >> >> I suggest 500-999; should not break LSB more than the 100-200 idea. But >> >> reuid'ing normal users is much easier than doing this for services. >> > >> > We can only mess with below 500. >> >> to be more exact: below 100 > > You do seem to contracdict yourself, is it now 500-999 or below 100 ;) you and notting are wanting to break the LSB by using an area which must not be used for fixed uids. I outlined an alternative which breaks LSB too but is much less painless on most systems. >> When my shadow-utils patch gets accepted, shadow-util's '--hint' option >> can be used too. > > That's just fedora-usermgmt merged upstream, right? basically, yes. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231525 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231540 There are missing some options to allow customization at repository level, but I will wait for a response to these two tickets first. > So it will have the same flaws like fedora-usermgmt About which flaws are you speaking? The example in the documentation which misleaded you, should be fixed. And since applied upstream or in RH shadow-utils, it will not be "proprietary" anymore. Enrico -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
