Re: Fedora User Management (revisited)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 11:15:51AM +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> >> > But for whatever its worth let's raise the fixed/non-fixed
> >> > cross-over from uid/gid 100 to 200 for F8 or F9.
> >> 
> >> I suggest 500-999; should not break LSB more than the 100-200 idea. But
> >> reuid'ing normal users is much easier than doing this for services.
> >
> > We can only mess with below 500.
> 
> to be more exact: below 100

You do seem to contracdict yourself, is it now 500-999 or below 100 ;)

Anyway, the correct answer is still below 500:

# grep 500 /etc/login.defs
UID_MIN                   500
GID_MIN                   500

> When my shadow-utils patch gets accepted, shadow-util's '--hint' option
> can be used too.

That's just fedora-usermgmt merged upstream, right? So it will have
the same flaws like fedora-usermgmt (other than not being merged
upstream).
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpbQfWREhSh6.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux