Bill Nottingham wrote:
Nicolas Mailhot (nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx) said:
Or bite the bullet and reserve a new fixed uid range
+100
Just do it, have a registry. When we get to a situation that requires 500
separate system UIDs, we'll deal with it then. I don't want to be
the "640k should be enough for everyone" guy, but I'd have to think that
by the time we get to that point, we will have gone way beyond the
point of diminishing returns in additional packages.
Bill
Just so we do know the numbers:
$ repoquery --whatrequires '/usr/sbin/useradd' --qf='%{name}' | sort |
uniq | wc -l
54
$ repoquery --whatrequires 'fedora-usermgmt' --qf='%{name}' | sort |
uniq | wc -l
25
Total of 79. This is actually fewer users then I thought and a larger
adoption rate of fedora usermgmt then I thought. Anywho, its not 640k
:-D but that's our number
-Mike
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
