On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 14:03 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote: > Josh Boyer wrote: > > > > Um... why? EPEL can't support it in RHEL 4 anyway. I see the two sets > > being disjoint. It's not a "Fedora" problem. It's an EPEL problem. > > > This statement is very nearsighted. How so? Without an explanation I'll never learn. It's going to continue to be a trend for EPEL. Fedora will have new shiny things it wants to use, but EPEL will not be able to support them given it's lifecycle and stability goals. Trying to constantly "converge" the packages/policies for the sake of commonality is going to be an ongoing battle. So, EPEL has their own branches. Why can't there be a differing solution between Fedora and EPEL? josh -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
