Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> > But for whatever its worth let's raise the fixed/non-fixed >> > cross-over from uid/gid 100 to 200 for F8 or F9. >> >> I suggest 500-999; should not break LSB more than the 100-200 idea. But >> reuid'ing normal users is much easier than doing this for services. > > We can only mess with below 500. to be more exact: below 100 > Moving the bar from 100 to 200/anything will already break > applications that randomly were allocated to some uid there, and this > needs to be fixed per package, that's why we need a F8/F9 timeframe > for doing that. Why do we want to break existing installations overall? We could use exisisting solutions like fedora-usermgmt after ironing out documentation issues. When my shadow-utils patch gets accepted, shadow-util's '--hint' option can be used too. Enrico -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
