Re: Fedora User Management (revisited)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 12:15 +0100, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> you and notting are wanting to break the LSB by using an area which must
> not be used for fixed uids. I outlined an alternative which breaks LSB
> too but is much less painless on most systems.

Fuck the LSB. Last I checked, blind adherence to "standards" wasn't in
Fedora policy. The LSB fails to accommodate our needs in this situation.
The LSB's job is to accommodate *us*, the global collective of
distribution vendors, not the other way around.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux