Callum Lerwick <seg@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> you and notting are wanting to break the LSB by using an area which >> must not be used for fixed uids. I outlined an alternative which >> breaks LSB too but is much less painless on most systems. > > Fuck the LSB. Last I checked, blind adherence to "standards" > wasn't in Fedora policy. It is not a "blind adherence" but an adherence that existing systems should not be broken. You can not use range 100-499 for static uids because existing systems are having already uids in this range. > The LSB fails to accommodate our needs in this situation. The LSB's > job is to accommodate *us*, It was a wrong/shortsighted decision to reserve only 0-100 for static uids. But this decision can not be corrected anymore because there is no other room for static uids. Enrico
Attachment:
pgp91TOyHpliE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
-- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
