Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> > So it will have the same flaws like fedora-usermgmt >> >> About which flaws are you speaking? > > Please, repeating that you don't recognize any flaw is not making them > go away. Please, just because you do not recognize that the Flying Spaghetti Monster exists, it is not making it go away. Please, stop mentioning that there are flaws in fedora-usermgmt without naming them! > And we metioned several cases where fedora-usermgmt will boom, ... /me must be reading the wrong thread ... > if the package really relies on not getting a random uid, for example > when the admin notices that such a mechanism exists after the first > fedora-usermgmt packages have been installed. Or if the admin thinks > he can move the floating window to a new position, and is not aware > that the config is once-set-never-unset. Aieee.... when admin thinks, he can do 'rm -rf /', he will have some trouble too... > And many other examples that just show that floatng uid windows is A > Bad Idea. many == 0? Enrico -- Fedora-maintainers mailing list Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers -- Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly
