Re: Fedora User Management (revisited)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> > So it will have the same flaws like fedora-usermgmt
>> 
>> About which flaws are you speaking?
>
> Please, repeating that you don't recognize any flaw is not making them
> go away.

Please, just because you do not recognize that the Flying Spaghetti
Monster exists, it is not making it go away.

Please, stop mentioning that there are flaws in fedora-usermgmt without
naming them!


> And we metioned several cases where fedora-usermgmt will boom,

... /me must be reading the wrong thread ...


> if the package really relies on not getting a random uid, for example
> when the admin notices that such a mechanism exists after the first
> fedora-usermgmt packages have been installed. Or if the admin thinks
> he can move the floating window to a new position, and is not aware
> that the config is once-set-never-unset.

Aieee.... when admin thinks, he can do 'rm -rf /', he will have some
trouble too...


> And many other examples that just show that floatng uid windows is A
> Bad Idea.

many == 0?



Enrico

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux