Fedora Kernel Development
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: Pre-release kernel versioning
- From: Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Keep the FC6 kernel at 2.6.20 or move it to 2.6.21?
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Keep the FC6 kernel at 2.6.20 or move it to 2.6.21?
- From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Pre-release kernel versioning
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Keep the FC6 kernel at 2.6.20 or move it to 2.6.21?
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Keep the FC6 kernel at 2.6.20 or move it to 2.6.21?
- From: Jay Cliburn <jacliburn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Pre-release kernel versioning
- From: "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Pre-release kernel versioning
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Pre-release kernel versioning
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Keep the FC6 kernel at 2.6.20 or move it to 2.6.21?
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Keep the FC6 kernel at 2.6.20 or move it to 2.6.21?
- From: dragoran <drago01@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Pre-release kernel versioning
- From: "Tom \"spot\" Callaway" <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Pre-release kernel versioning
- From: Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- About audio programming
- From: "bluehat prometheus" <kmustlinux@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH FC6] x86_64 page_is_ram() uses __initdata; breaks /dev/crash and /dev/mem restriction
- From: Dave Anderson <anderson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OT] please review new kernel build doc on fedora wiki
- From: Sam Folk-Williams <samfw@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Keep the FC6 kernel at 2.6.20 or move it to 2.6.21?
- From: "Chris Brown" <snecklifter@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Keep the FC6 kernel at 2.6.20 or move it to 2.6.21?
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Keep the FC6 kernel at 2.6.20 or move it to 2.6.21?
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Keep the FC6 kernel at 2.6.20 or move it to 2.6.21?
- From: "Chris Brown" <snecklifter@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Keep the FC6 kernel at 2.6.20 or move it to 2.6.21?
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Keep the FC6 kernel at 2.6.20 or move it to 2.6.21?
- From: "Chris Brown" <snecklifter@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Keep the FC6 kernel at 2.6.20 or move it to 2.6.21?
- From: David Zeuthen <davidz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Keep the FC6 kernel at 2.6.20 or move it to 2.6.21?
- From: Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Keep the FC6 kernel at 2.6.20 or move it to 2.6.21?
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Keep the FC6 kernel at 2.6.20 or move it to 2.6.21?
- From: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Keep the FC6 kernel at 2.6.20 or move it to 2.6.21?
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OT] please review new kernel build doc on fedora wiki
- From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: solved!!! VDSO support, 2.6.20-1.2925 hangs after unmounting old proc and sys
- From: Daniel Kirsten <Daniel.Kirsten@xxxxxxx>
- Re: solved!!! VDSO support, 2.6.20-1.2925 hangs after unmounting old proc and sys
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: solved!!! VDSO support, 2.6.20-1.2925 hangs after unmounting old proc and sys
- From: Daniel Kirsten <Daniel.Kirsten@xxxxxxx>
- Re: solved!!! VDSO support, 2.6.20-1.2925 hangs after unmounting old proc and sys
- From: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: solved!!! VDSO support, 2.6.20-1.2925 hangs after unmounting old proc and sys
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: solved!!! VDSO support, 2.6.20-1.2925 hangs after unmounting old proc and sys
- From: Daniel Kirsten <Daniel.Kirsten@xxxxxxx>
- Re: solved!!! VDSO support, 2.6.20-1.2925 hangs after unmounting old proc and sys
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- solved!!! VDSO support, 2.6.20-1.2925 hangs after unmounting old proc and sys
- From: Daniel Kirsten <Daniel.Kirsten@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [OT] please review new kernel build doc on fedora wiki
- From: Sam Folk-Williams <samfw@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OT] please review new kernel build doc on fedora wiki
- From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Spinning kernel-vanilla packages via standard spec
- From: Jarod Wilson <jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Spinning kernel-vanilla packages via standard spec
- From: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Spinning kernel-vanilla packages via standard spec
- From: Jarod Wilson <jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Make "pci=nomsi" the default on 2.6.20 kernels?
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OT] please review new kernel build doc on fedora wiki
- From: Sam Folk-Williams <samfw@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Putting the full unstripped modules in the kernel-debuginfo package
- From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Putting the full unstripped modules in the kernel-debuginfo package
- From: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Putting the full unstripped modules in the kernel-debuginfo package
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Putting the full unstripped modules in the kernel-debuginfo package
- From: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Putting the full unstripped modules in the kernel-debuginfo package
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Putting the full unstripped modules in the kernel-debuginfo package
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Putting the full unstripped modules in the kernel-debuginfo package
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [OT] please review new kernel build doc on fedora wiki
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Kernel oops 2.6.20-2925.5.fc7xen
- From: Jay Cliburn <jacliburn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Spinning kernel-vanilla packages via standard spec
- From: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Needed: An easier way to build a subset of kernel packages
- From: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Needed: An easier way to build a subset of kernel packages
- From: Jarod Wilson <jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Spinning kernel-vanilla packages via standard spec
- From: Jarod Wilson <jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Needed: An easier way to build a subset of kernel packages
- From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Needed: An easier way to build a subset of kernel packages
- From: Jarod Wilson <jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Needed: An easier way to build a subset of kernel packages
- From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Spinning kernel-vanilla packages via standard spec
- From: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Spinning kernel-vanilla packages via standard spec
- From: Jarod Wilson <jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Spinning kernel-vanilla packages via standard spec
- From: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Backwards compatible module symlinks
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Backwards compatible module symlinks
- From: Jon Masters <jcm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Make "pci=nomsi" the default on 2.6.20 kernels?
- From: Kyle McMartin <kyle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Make "pci=nomsi" the default on 2.6.20 kernels?
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Make "pci=nomsi" the default on 2.6.20 kernels?
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Backwards compatible module symlinks
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Make "pci=nomsi" the default on 2.6.20 kernels?
- From: Kyle McMartin <kyle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Make "pci=nomsi" the default on 2.6.20 kernels?
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Make "pci=nomsi" the default on 2.6.20 kernels?
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Spinning kernel-vanilla packages via standard spec
- From: Jarod Wilson <jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Something is changing the firmware loading timeout
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Make "pci=nomsi" the default on 2.6.20 kernels?
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Make "pci=nomsi" the default on 2.6.20 kernels?
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Make "pci=nomsi" the default on 2.6.20 kernels?
- From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Qlogic firmware isn't in the FC7 kernel
- From: Jeremy Katz <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Qlogic firmware isn't in the FC7 kernel
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Make "pci=nomsi" the default on 2.6.20 kernels?
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Needed: An easier way to build a subset of kernel packages
- From: Jarod Wilson <jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Make "pci=nomsi" the default on 2.6.20 kernels?
- From: Jay Cliburn <jcliburn@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Make "pci=nomsi" the default on 2.6.20 kernels?
- From: Jon Masters <jcm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Make "pci=nomsi" the default on 2.6.20 kernels?
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Needed: An easier way to build a subset of kernel packages
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Longing for git-bisect
- From: "Jeffrey C. Ollie" <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Needed: An easier way to build a subset of kernel packages
- From: Jarod Wilson <jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Crazy idea
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: rpms for vanilla kernel builds ...
- From: "Clinton Lee Taylor" <clintonlee.taylor@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: rpms for vanilla kernel builds ...
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- rpms for vanilla kernel builds ...
- From: "Clinton Lee Taylor" <clintonlee.taylor@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Qlogic firmware isn't in the FC7 kernel
- From: Jon Masters <jcm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Qlogic firmware isn't in the FC7 kernel
- From: Jon Masters <jcm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Qlogic firmware isn't in the FC7 kernel
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Crazy idea
- From: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Qlogic firmware isn't in the FC7 kernel
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- turn CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX_ENABLE_SECMARK_DEFAULT on
- From: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Needed: An easier way to build a subset of kernel packages
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Needed: An easier way to build a subset of kernel packages
- From: Jarod Wilson <jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enable SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM
- From: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Needed: An easier way to build a subset of kernel packages
- From: Jarod Wilson <jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Needed: An easier way to build a subset of kernel packages
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Needed: An easier way to build a subset of kernel packages
- From: Jarod Wilson <jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Longing for git-bisect
- From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Crazy idea
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Chance of dynamic loading of alternate AML code getting in?
- From: Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Crazy idea
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Crazy idea
- From: Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx>
- Re: Needed: An easier way to build a subset of kernel packages
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Fedora PATCH]: BZ 234473 Remove sparse directory listing from kernel rpmbuild
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Needed: An easier way to build a subset of kernel packages
- From: Jarod Wilson <jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enable SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM
- From: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Needed: An easier way to build a subset of kernel packages
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Crazy idea
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Chance of dynamic loading of alternate AML code getting in?
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Crazy idea
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Fedora PATCH]: BZ 234473 Remove sparse directory listing from kernel rpmbuild
- From: Jon Masters <jcm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Fedora PATCH]: BZ 234473 Remove sparse directory listing from kernel rpmbuild
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Needed: An easier way to build a subset of kernel packages
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Fedora PATCH]: BZ 234473 Remove sparse directory listing from kernel rpmbuild
- From: Jon Masters <jcm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Chance of dynamic loading of alternate AML code getting in?
- From: Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx>
- Re: [Fedora PATCH]: BZ 234473 Remove sparse directory listing from kernel rpmbuild
- From: Jarod Wilson <jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Crazy idea
- From: Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx>
- Re: [Fedora PATCH]: BZ 234473 Remove sparse directory listing from kernel rpmbuild
- From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enable SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Enable SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM
- From: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Enable SECURITY_NETWORK_XFRM
- From: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [Fedora PATCH]: BZ 234473 Remove sparse directory listing from kernel rpmbuild
- From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [OT] please review new kernel build doc on fedora wiki
- From: Sam Folk-Williams <samfw@xxxxxxxxxx>
- kernel build hacks for vanilla builds
- From: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Longing for git-bisect
- From: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Longing for git-bisect
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Longing for git-bisect
- From: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Longing for git-bisect
- From: Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Longing for git-bisect
- From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Longing for git-bisect
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Longing for git-bisect
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Longing for git-bisect
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Debugging Soft Lockups in FC kernels
- From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Debugging Soft Lockups in FC kernels
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Debugging Soft Lockups in FC kernels
- From: "Jonathan Underwood" <jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Longing for git-bisect
- From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Longing for git-bisect
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Longing for git-bisect
- From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Longing for git-bisect
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Longing for git-bisect
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Backwards-compatible /proc and sysctl conntrack entries
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Backwards-compatible /proc and sysctl conntrack entries
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Backwards-compatible /proc and sysctl conntrack entries
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Backwards-compatible /proc and sysctl conntrack entries
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Backwards-compatible /proc and sysctl conntrack entries
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Backwards-compatible /proc and sysctl conntrack entries
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Backwards-compatible /proc and sysctl conntrack entries
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Backwards-compatible /proc and sysctl conntrack entries
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Something is changing the firmware loading timeout
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Something is changing the firmware loading timeout
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: /dev/dvb device nodes not being created?
- From: Jarod Wilson <jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problems with kernel updates needing non-kernel changes
- From: David Zeuthen <davidz@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problems with kernel updates needing non-kernel changes
- From: Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should we be using CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL in the Fedora kernel?
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: /dev/dvb device nodes not being created?
- From: Jarod Wilson <jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: /dev/dvb device nodes not being created?
- From: Jarod Wilson <jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should we be using CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL in the Fedora kernel?
- From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should we be using CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL in the Fedora kernel?
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: /dev/dvb device nodes not being created?
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: /dev/dvb device nodes not being created?
- From: Jarod Wilson <jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.20-1.2925 hangs after unmounting old proc and sys
- From: Daniel Kirsten <Daniel.Kirsten@xxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6 kernel, switch/case statement and stack usage
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.20-1.2925 hangs after unmounting old proc and sys
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.20-1.2925 hangs after unmounting old proc and sys
- From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.20-1.2925 hangs after unmounting old proc and sys
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.20-1.2925 hangs after unmounting old proc and sys
- From: Daniel Kirsten <Daniel.Kirsten@xxxxxxx>
- Re: What use is the kernel-debuginfo package?
- From: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.20-1.2925 hangs after unmounting old proc and sys
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.20-1.2925 hangs after unmounting old proc and sys
- From: Daniel Kirsten <Daniel.Kirsten@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Problems with kernel updates needing non-kernel changes
- From: Jeremy Katz <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problems with kernel updates needing non-kernel changes
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problems with kernel updates needing non-kernel changes
- From: Jeremy Katz <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problems with kernel updates needing non-kernel changes
- From: Jon Masters <jcm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problems with kernel updates needing non-kernel changes
- From: Jeremy Katz <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problems with kernel updates needing non-kernel changes
- From: Jeremy Katz <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problems with kernel updates needing non-kernel changes
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problems with kernel updates needing non-kernel changes
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problems with kernel updates needing non-kernel changes
- From: Jon Masters <jcm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: /dev/dvb device nodes not being created?
- From: "Chris Brown" <snecklifter@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Problems with kernel updates needing non-kernel changes
- From: Jeremy Katz <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Problems with kernel updates needing non-kernel changes
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: /dev/dvb device nodes not being created?
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.20-1.2925 hangs after unmounting old proc and sys
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse checking
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: /dev/dvb device nodes not being created?
- From: dragoran <drago01@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: /dev/dvb device nodes not being created?
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- /dev/dvb device nodes not being created?
- From: "Chris Brown" <snecklifter@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.20-1.2925 hangs after unmounting old proc and sys
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: What use is the kernel-debuginfo package?
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- 2.6.20-1.2925 hangs after unmounting old proc and sys
- From: Daniel Kirsten <Daniel.Kirsten@xxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse checking
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- 2.6 kernel, switch/case statement and stack usage
- From: Constantine Gavrilov <constantine.gavrilov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse checking
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse checking
- From: Jon Masters <jcm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse checking
- From: Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse checking
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse checking
- From: Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse checking
- From: Jon Masters <jcm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: sparse checking
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- sparse checking
- From: Jon Masters <jcm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: What use is the kernel-debuginfo package?
- From: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: What use is the kernel-debuginfo package?
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should we be using CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL in the Fedora kernel?
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: What use is the kernel-debuginfo package?
- From: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should we be using CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL in the Fedora kernel?
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- What use is the kernel-debuginfo package?
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should we be using CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL in the Fedora kernel?
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Should we be using CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL in the Fedora kernel?
- From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should we be using CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL in the Fedora kernel?
- From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should we be using CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL in the Fedora kernel?
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Should we be using CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL in the Fedora kernel?
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Should we be using CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL in the Fedora kernel?
- From: Jon Masters <jcm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should we be using CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL in the Fedora kernel?
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should we be using CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL in the Fedora kernel?
- From: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should we be using CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL in the Fedora kernel?
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should we be using CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL in the Fedora kernel?
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should we be using CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL in the Fedora kernel?
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should we be using CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL in the Fedora kernel?
- From: Jon Masters <jcm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Should we be using CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL in the Fedora kernel?
- From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 2.6.20-1.2999.fc7 and suspend
- From: Linda Wang <lwang@xxxxxxxxxx>
- 2.6.20-1.2999.fc7 and suspend
- From: Bill Peck <bpeck@xxxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Older Fedora Users Mail]
[DVB]
[Samba]
[USB]
[Yosemite Questions]
