* Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > actually, the current code works pretty well - and has been brought > > to the extreme via PREEMPT_RT. It boots fine on SMP and elsewhere, > > and it finds us tons of bugs in every kernel release. > > If you say so, I take it back. CONFIG_PREEMPT alone is probably not worth having: it doesnt bring enough to the table, has overhead and doesnt satisfy the low-latency users. PREEMPT_RT is much nicer - but quite a bit more intrusive =B-) Ingo _______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
