On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 15:10 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > Jon Masters wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 15:01 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > >> I get the feeling that some of the bugs we are seeing is because > >> we have enabled CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL. I remember looking at the > >> code when it came out and thinking it was too scary to enable, > >> so I never did in my own vanilla kernels. > > > > Well, it's likely to remain around upstream so surely it's better to fix > > bugs and feed them back upstream than ignore this, it'll just be painful > > later on IMO :-) > > > > Well yeah, but it's optional. We don't enable CONFIG_PREEMPT and that's > been there for a long time... I'd enable CONFIG_PREEMPT myself...but that's me :-) Jon.
