Jon Masters wrote: > On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 15:01 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: >> I get the feeling that some of the bugs we are seeing is because >> we have enabled CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL. I remember looking at the >> code when it came out and thinking it was too scary to enable, >> so I never did in my own vanilla kernels. > > Well, it's likely to remain around upstream so surely it's better to fix > bugs and feed them back upstream than ignore this, it'll just be painful > later on IMO :-) > Well yeah, but it's optional. We don't enable CONFIG_PREEMPT and that's been there for a long time...
