Re: Should we be using CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL in the Fedora kernel?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



FWIW, I have taken to CONFIG_PREEMPT=y in my hacking kernels because it
exposed on my clunky test machines bugs that were otherwise reproduced only
on big honking machines with lots of parallelism.  I haven't experienced a
bug that wasn't there at all with CONFIG_PREEMPT=n, only ones that were
hard to reproduce in hacker's conditions but more likely in production load
conditions.  So, out of sight, out of mind, sure.  But out of sight,
lurking to bite you in the ass later when you really aren't in the mood,
also damn likely.


Roland


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux