On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:57:49 -0400 Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We could do a rebase to .21 this week, and push that out to testing, > and if anything critical turns up before that becomes deemed stable, > we could push a branched build off of .20 directly to updates. > > Most of the scary stuff (new libata pata drivers etc), we'd keep off, > so things shouldn't be too bad. The timer changes for tickless are > probably the only remaining scary thing. For that we have a few > choices. > - Leave NO_HZ off. > Feature parity with FC6, though the code has still changed, and > may still find regressions. Probably the safest option. > - Turn NO_HZ on. > Early preview of F7 features, saves power yadayada, may find new > bugs. (Gets us that nice fuzzy 'f6 bugs are f7 bugs' bonus though) > - Turn NO_HZ on, but do the same as we did for MSI (enable the config, > but only if you boot with a command line option). > Might find us even more regressions, that aren't even relevant > upstream. What about MSI? On or off? _______________________________________________ Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
