Re: Problems with kernel updates needing non-kernel changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 14:22 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> Jeremy Katz wrote:
> >> 2) some modules may now work that were broken, but they need
> >>    new options, like snd-hda-intel which now works on my acer
> >>    notebook if "probe_mask=1" is added to the module options.
> > 
> > This is just a case of broken drivers.  Having to manually
> > (modprobe.conf counts :) specify a module option to make a driver work
> > means that the driver is broken -- these things _have_ to be
> > auto-detected.  Punting it to the user just isn't practical or
> > reasonable.
> > 
> But don't we do that now? Doesn't Anaconda know about options needed
> for certain hardware and put them in modprobe.conf at install time?

Nope!  We list the module name and that's in.  Any module options that
end up there were specified manually (and through an excruciatingly
painful UI) by the user

Jeremy


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux