> > On Mar 2, 2018, at 1:28 PM, Adam Roach <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > The position of "if you don't want to be photographed carte blanche, then don't participate in face-to-face meetings" is exclusionary and hostile to anyone who values that aspect of their privacy. > It is an it should be. > The expectation of privacy is gone (for non commercial uses). Got commercial uses, the issue is compensation (or giving up that right) not private per se afaict. > I see no reason why an ietf meeting should try to be more private that would any other venue that invites public participation. +1 > Remember too that two party consent to recording isn’t universal either. Also remember there are two aspects to the Streisand Effect, the first being the effect itself, the second being that those who get slammed by it invariably believed it couldn't possibly happen to them. Ned
