Re: Proposed Photography Policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Fwiw we already have opt-in for reasonable cases - it’s called showing up. 

Joe

> On Mar 2, 2018, at 11:36 AM, Joe Touch <touch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On Mar 2, 2018, at 10:44 AM, Mary B <mary.h.barnes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> Joe,
>> 
>> Thanks for providing some more context.  But, why can't the problem be handled by someone asking the person/people that have a tendency to get in people's faces, to please stop doing that?   Or has been noted elsewhere, those that are really feeling *physically* intimidated should talk to the ombudsperson.  Why do we need some sort of special designation for this specific behavior that is intimidating
> 
> I don’t think we do. 
> 
> I also don’t want a red lanyard and a policy to empower anyone to claim harassment for a small number of photos at a non-intimidating distance - whether those lanyards are noticed or not. 
> 
> If we have a small number of problems  with individual harassment we should be able to deal with that via existing policy. 
> 
> Joe





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux