On 3/2/18 2:20 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
On Mar 2, 2018, at 12:02 PM, Adam Roach <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 3/2/18 1:37 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
Fwiw we already have opt-in for reasonable cases - it’s called showing up.
This is *exactly* the inclusiveness issue that I highlighted earlier. Thanks for the demonstration.
/a
Can you clarify?
The position of "if you don't want to be photographed carte blanche,
then don't participate in face-to-face meetings" is exclusionary and
hostile to anyone who values that aspect of their privacy. I can see how
we ended up with it as a legacy policy, but once the issues with that
policy have been made flagged [1], it's pretty indefensible.
Again, if this rises to a level of harassment we already have a mechanism. But anonymity is directly defeated by the act of appearing in public.
It's not about strict anonymity; it's about (to borrow Suzanne's
characterization) "time, place, and manner."
/a
____
[1] I'm not posting the Ada Initiative link a fourth time -- I assume
that, if you're following this thread, you've seen it already and just
don't care.
