(coming late to the party...how comes I overlooked this thread??) On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 1:09 AM, John Curran <jcurran@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > To that end, would it be possible for those behind the "IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF” > draft to partner with the NOC at the upcoming meeting to help debug issues that > are reported on “ietf-nat64* and publish the results? The IETF does have a wide > variety of users, which is really helpful in finding edge cases with protocols that > might have issues and otherwise go undiscovered. If it were may clear (e.g. during > the opening) that there is a goal to put the “ietf-nat64” network through its paces > and that there would be a post-mortem I-D as a result, I suspect quite a few folks > would at least give that setup a try for a while, with the goal of finding and reporting > breakage. Well, that is exactly what some of us have been doing (not only at IETF, I have some data from RIPE NAT64 network as well). So far we have quite short list of issues and majority of them fall into one category: corporate VPNs either are not configured to support IPv6-only clients or can not support such clients at all. It would be great to see more users on NAT64 network to see/detect more issues... -- SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry