> The point is that we claim that we have produced something that will
> Just Work for the average user. If you really think you can't "get
> work done" on an IPv6-only network with working and functional
> transition tech, we have a problem.
bingo! you are right. we have a problem. nat64/dns64 breaks things
people use. this is known, documented, and extremely annoying this many
years out [0].
the question is how to progress fixing nat64/dns64, given that a lot of
folk come to ietf meetings to simply get work done and not debug a semi-
working transport. how about a bug bounty? and maybe a fix bounty a
few times larger!
randy
--
0 - for just how many years, see my plenary rant against 4966 a few
chicagos back. it is my $dayjob's customers, the enterprises, who
are the main target of nat64/dns64, and i am not happy that they can
not deploy it safely.