On 7/17/23 21:51, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
However, the review teams were *invented* as a result of the IESG not seeing enough evidence of broad community review, and not having time to thoroughly review every draft.
I understand, but a set of hand-picked reviewers will never be an adequate substitute for broad community review. And there's a danger that ordinary community members won't bother to review drafts because they assume that the review teams will do that.
Keith
