Re: Registration details for IETF 108

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx> wrote:
    >> IMNSHO I don’t think pursuing awkward 2D MMORPG-style interaction is
    >> useful.  gather reminds me most of 1990’s PARC spin-off PlaceWare.
    >>
    >> For moving IETF online, I’d suggest hiring some group that does it for
    >> a living https://www.diplomacy.edu/conference-tech-lab

    > looks like commercial folk who dress well consulting to help you select
    > from 1990s 2d mmorpgs, particularly the commercial ones owned by big
    > corporates.  that will fit well in to the new ietf corporate model.

    > lisa actually tried to get open standards 3d mmorpg going, but ietf was
    > not interested.

I don't think that is accurate.
Randy, it's not always the IETF that is problem.

From what I could tell, none of the participating companies wanted to ceed
revision control to the IETF, let alone adopt a system that might be based
upon their competitors specifications.

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxx  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux