Re: Summary of the 2008-04-08 Packaging Committee meeting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Les Mikesell wrote:

Yes, but now we are back to the fact that the jpackage ones didn't conflict with anything until fedora started including conflicting ones, so it seems in bad taste to blame the third party.

I didn't blame anyone. Just stated facts.

Sorry if that sounds
insulting, but that's just the way it looks from outside. If there was some big effort made to avoid this problem and it proved to be impossible, I must have missed the reasons.

You did despite it being explained to you several times. There are major software components like Openoffice.org and Eclipse that depends on Java. Excluding all the software just because they are in a third party repository is impossible. I will the end the discussion here since you seem to be going in circles.

Rahul

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux