Re: Summary of the 2008-04-08 Packaging Committee meeting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:

Once you start relying on yum/rpm, there's nothing much uglier than conflicting packages.

Conflicting third party repo/packages are for distributions regardless of the package manager.

Yes, but now we are back to the fact that the jpackage ones didn't conflict with anything until fedora started including conflicting ones, so it seems in bad taste to blame the third party. Sorry if that sounds insulting, but that's just the way it looks from outside. If there was some big effort made to avoid this problem and it proved to be impossible, I must have missed the reasons.


I'd hope there could be a general solution.

There is no silver bullet.

Not as long as conflicting versions of pre-existing packages are added to the base repositories...

--
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux