Rahul Sundaram wrote:
How about changing the names of the packages (and perhaps the location
of the files) that you must include for dependencies? I'd much rather
waste space with duplicates that don't conflict than have potentially
conflicting same-named packages/files.
That's a ugly hack and won't on all cases.
Once you start relying on yum/rpm, there's nothing much uglier than
conflicting packages.
Some paths are just
standardized and changing them would break a lot of things including
non-packaged applications.
If things are standardized to the point that they can't be changed, then
I don't see how keeping those jpackage/fedora versions identical can be
such a big problem.
You have to figure out specific issues and
talk to the Fedora Java team.
I'd hope there could be a general solution.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
