Re: Summary of the 2008-04-08 Packaging Committee meeting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:


Then just admit that the duplication causes more harm than good and make the user set up his own yum configuration if pointing to jpackage is a problem for you. Do the same with openoffice if you can't support it without badly duplicating packages with better upstreams. What's the point of making things worse for your users?

Repository conflicts have always existed. As long as there is more than one repository that is not perfectly complimentary, that is just a fact of life. We just learn to work with it in a way we can.

But the way we work around that problem is to not use the one that conflicts. I think you are suggesting not using fedora unless you provide a straightforward exclusion method for the conflicting packages. is that really what you want people to do?

If that doesn't suit you, do your own thing instead. Good luck.

Everyone doing their own thing is the problem here. Encouraging it is absolutely the wrong thing.

--
  Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux