Re: Summary of the 2008-04-08 Packaging Committee meeting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rahul Sundaram wrote:

I'm not demanding anything, I am just presenting a user's perspective and from here it looks like you are currently doing extra work to make things different and incompatible.

It doesn't look anything like that if you are paying any attention at all. Again, cut the drama. Constantly throwing insults at a project just because you have different opinions on how it should be done isn't the way to present anything much less act as a user representative.

I'm trying to be realistic, not insulting. I just think that needing to use 3rd party apps is common and thus representative for users. How else is there to present that other than to bring up difficulties?

The difficulties are understood and the tools are there. If you want to learn about them, ask in a users list.

The users list might tell me how someone else managed to work around certain difficulties but no one there would be able to help eliminate them or know whether that work-around is expected to be reliable through updates or just happened to work for the person who tried it. And particularly in the case of jpackage I don't see the point. Is it impossible to make the parts you have in common identical or change the names so you have nothing in common?

--
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux