On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 01:49 +0300, Pavel Shevchuk wrote: > swfdec depends on less gnome-libs, and at least for me it works much > better than gnash. It also has very nice "click to enable" feature How did you get it to even work? For me, with gstreamer -good -bad -ugly and -ffmpeg, doesn't work at all. With the same setup, gnash at least works in some cases (youtube for instance). I'd rather just use Adblock/NoScripts to block such content on sites I don't want to display. This way, it also collapses the given flash object. Further, swfdec-mozilla depends swfdec-gtk, whereas I don't see any Gnome related deps for gnash... > On 5/15/08, Francis Earl <francis.earl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Are there any technical reasons as to why Fedora seems to prefer SWFdec > > over Gnash? > > > > I understand that to be part of the Gnome Developer Platform, your > > project must be LGPL, which Gnash is not, but Gnash actually works today > > for the more popular use cases (YouTube and friends) and seems to be > > implemented in a far better way (OpenGL etc) ... > > > > Also, wrt to gcjwebplugin, is there any way to make games like > > games.yahoo.com/pl work? I am sort of addicted to that game, but I'd > > rather not install the proprietary plugin. > > > > Thank you for any assistance, or feedback :) > > > > -- > > fedora-devel-list mailing list > > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > > > > > > > -- > http://scwlab.com >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
