On 02/10/2012 07:12 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> Given all that, it seems only logical to conclude that Fedora really >> _isn't_ primarily intended for use as a production server. > > Bingo, which is why it's important for people like me who do it to > realize what they're getting into and take some responsibility for > that choice, like with any other technological choice. If you aren't > will to either take downtime for Anaconda or preupgrade, or do lots of > fresh installs, or mess with yum upgrades, use RHEL/CO/SL/Etc. Not > for the feint of heart, and I sure as heck don't do it at work. :) For what it's worth, I *do* use it at work and on the whole I have very little trouble. Yes, upgrading can be a PITA, but it's usually just a few hours. I don't mind. Andrew. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
