Jon Masters píše v Po 30. 08. 2010 v 17:17 -0400: > On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 23:11 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > > Now, if we Fedora should be a distribution that developers enjoy using, > > there will be an updates firehose - and most developers won't mind too > > much. If Fedora should be a distribution that developers can install on > > their grandparents' computers, developers won't enjoy working on the > > distribution so much - both because this requires bureaucracy, and > > because the result is not as interesting a distribution - and either the > > quality and size of the distribution will suffer, or there will have to > > be another motivation for many people to participate. > > Why does it have to be one or the other? There are ways to do both with > vitualization, separate stream of packages, multiple versions of the > same thing. Who knows what else. The point is, nobody is saying you > can't take a stable base and add in more recent bits for your area of > interest if six months really is too long for you to wait. Because all these options require additional work from _each additional user_. Or do we form 2048 specialized Fedora repos, one for each set of interesting packages? That just doesn't work. Mirek -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
