Jon Masters wrote: > Why does it have to be one or the other? There are ways to do both with > vitualization, separate stream of packages, multiple versions of the > same thing. Who knows what else. The point is, nobody is saying you > can't take a stable base and add in more recent bits for your area of > interest if six months really is too long for you to wait. Jon, you seem hard set on your ways. You, rudely, snipped a well articulated e-mail down to what you want to pick a fight about. Why are we even continuing this discussion? Fedora will be made by the people that make it. I happily contribute as a QA person and now as a package maintainer. You should be happy that more and more people are getting on board for open source development instead of telling everyone to wait their turn. Yes, there is a compromise between Kevin Kofler and Jon Masters. It's called Fedora. Let Fedora 14 ride and watch the new policies unfurl (as many others have already stated). -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
