> >PS: I still hate digital. These days it's on cost more than quality. > >Actually, its mostly on cost ;o) > > Well, I haven't shot that much in the 6 months I've owned the 10D. but > I've shot way more than with film. Still, I'm up over 2300 shots now. > I figure that would have cost me quite a bit of the camera's price if > it'd been film. Even at that Jim, the cost of the camera body is only a tiny part of the equation. The true costs of digital are linked to planned obsolescence / upgradeitis. The emotional cost is (for me) in getting even more dependant on computers, and tied into the Bill Gates protection racket. Bob
