Re: RFC: net/netfilter reorganization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 2008-10-07 13:09, Roman Zippel wrote:

>>  config NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_CONNMARK
>> -       tristate  '"CONNMARK" target support'
>> +       tristate
>>         depends on NF_CONNTRACK
>>         depends on NETFILTER_ADVANCED
>>         select NF_CONNTRACK_MARK
>> 
>> nukes TARGET_CONNMARK from .config - as in, there is not even a
>> "# TARGET_CONNMARK is unset" line.
>
>That's correct, as it doesn't get any value (either from a default or a 
>select). If it has a value, it will be used to select other symbols.
>
>> As such I can understand why adding a "select ELSE" for TARGET_CONNMARK
>> won't work.
>
>I don't quite understand what you're trying to do. :)

We are trying to combine TARGET_CONNMARK and MATCH_CONNMARK into a
new option, and doing so without showing {TARGET,MATCH}, yet
selecting BOTH_CONNMARK when either of {TARGET,MATCH} was previously
selected (e.g by feeding oldconfig something that has these options
active).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux