On Monday 2008-10-06 06:07, Patrick McHardy wrote: >>[troubles with Kconfig syntaxe about BOTH_CTMARK] > > That should be fine though since the old options already exist > (in most cases)? > > BTW, does it make any difference if you add a dependency > on TARGET_CTMARK || MATCH_CTMARK? Unfortunately no. If I use "BOTH_CTMARK depends on TARGET_CTMARK || MATCH_CTMARK", the option does not show itself. Somewhat understandable. I also tried "BOTH_CTMARK default m if TARGET_CTMARK=m || MATCH_CTMARK=m", also a no-go. Seems like config options without a one-line text are considered nonexistent for kconfig to begin with, so that nothing can depend or default on these. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
