Re: RFC: net/netfilter reorganization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday 2008-10-05 16:28, David Miller wrote:
>> On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> 
>> > I'd like to go for $(always lowercase extension name)_{mt,tg}.c if 
>> > noone objects.
>> > Or, when obvious extensions get combined maybe (like xt_mark and xt_MARK),
>> > just mark.c and the issue is all gone.
>> 
>> I think match/target combined in one file is the best way to go. As they 
>> cover the same realm (match some quantity of something and change it), 
>> they do fit together.
>
>This also makes sense to me.

Before I start moving code, would we may want to combine more modules
into one file at this point besides xt_FOO and xt_foo only?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux