Re: RFC: net/netfilter reorganization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Tue, 7 Oct 2008, Jan Engelhardt wrote:

> Nope. A patch as simple as
> 
> --- a/net/netfilter/Kconfig
> +++ b/net/netfilter/Kconfig
> @@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ config NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_CLASSIFY
>           To compile it as a module, choose M here.  If unsure, say N.
>  
>  config NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_CONNMARK
> -       tristate  '"CONNMARK" target support'
> +       tristate
>         depends on NF_CONNTRACK
>         depends on NETFILTER_ADVANCED
>         select NF_CONNTRACK_MARK
> 
> nukes TARGET_CONNMARK from .config - as in, there is not even a
> "# TARGET_CONNMARK is unset" line.

That's correct, as it doesn't get any value (either from a default or a 
select). If it has a value, it will be used to select other symbols.

> As such I can understand why adding a "select ELSE" for TARGET_CONNMARK
> won't work.

I don't quite understand what you're trying to do. :)

bye, Roman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netfitler Users]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]

  Powered by Linux